Promoting decoding among young students with Swedish as a first and second language within a response to intervention model

Abstract views: 694 / PDF downloads: 270




RTI, Swedish as a second language, Reading, Young students


Many young students with Swedish as their second language need support to acquire reading ability. There is a need for evidence-based reading instruction in early reading education for students with Swedish as their first or second language. Therefore, the current study investigated whether early reading education based on a Response to Intervention (RTI) model with a focus on decoding skills can promote reading ability among young students with Swedish as their first or second language. In Grades 1 and 2, 113 students with Swedish as a first and Swedish as a second language were followed. Applying the RTI model, teachers used evidence-based reading instruction in the whole class. Besides, additional instructions were provided in small groups and individually for students with weak decoding. Results of the study showed that the additional instruction provided within the RTI model had the potential to promote decoding, but to a different extent among students with Swedish as their second language. The importance of differentiated instruction, early monitoring and support, a bilingual approach in reading education for second language students, and collaboration between teachers are discussed.


Abedi, J., & Gándara, P. (2006). Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large‐scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 36-46. DOI:

Arias-Gundín, O., & García Llamazares, A. (2021). Efficacy of the RTI model in the treatment of reading learning disabilities. Education Sciences, 11(5), 209. DOI:

Arnold, D. H., & Doctoroff, G. L. (2003). The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 517-545. DOI:

August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2017). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Routledge. DOI:

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5-51. DOI:

Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. DOI:

Cummins, J. (2021). Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters. DOI:

Denton, C. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 232-243. DOI:

Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78-103. DOI:

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), 25-44. DOI:

Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala, & L. C. Ehri (1st Ed.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 13-50). Routledge.

Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5– 21. DOI:

Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: a configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157-170. DOI:

Fälth, L., Gustafson, S., Kugelberg, E., & Nordström, T. (2017). LegiLexis formativa bedömningsverktyg-Testmanual [LegiLexis Formative Assessment Tool - Test Manual].

Fälth, L., Selenius, H., & Egerhag, H. (2023). A cross-sectional study on reading among young L1 and L2 students in Sweden. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(2), 233-244. DOI:

Felth Sjölund, I., Hed Andersson, P., & Wänblad, M. (2012). Diamantjakten. Lärarhandledning [Diamond hunt. Theacher’s guide. Natur & Kultur.

Felth Sjölund, I., Hed Andersson, P., Wänblad, M., & Lundberg, I. (2011). Den magiska kulan 1. Lärarhandledning [The magic bullet 1. Theacher’s guide. Natur & Kultur.

Fien, H., Smith, J. L. M., Baker, S. K., Chaparro, E., Baker, D. L., & Preciado, J. A. (2011). Including English learners in a multitiered approach to early reading instruction and intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(3), 143-157. DOI:

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99. DOI:

Gersten, R., Haymond, K. Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi., M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. DOI:

Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 330-344. DOI:

Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6˗10. DOI:

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Haager, D. (2007). Promises and cautions regarding using response to intervention with English language learners. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 213-218. DOI:

Hall, C., Steinle, P. K., & Vaughn, S. (2019). Reading instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: What do we already know, and what do we still need to learn?. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(166), 145-189. DOI:

Hallin, A. E., Danielsson, H., Nordström, T., & Fälth, L. (2022). No learning loss in Sweden during the pandemic: Evidence from primary school reading assessments. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102011. DOI:

Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J., Supkoff, L. M., Heistad, D., Chan,C.-K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Early reading skills and academic achievement trajectories of students facing poverty, homelessness, and high residential mobility. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 366-374. DOI:

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160. DOI:

Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 64(1), 160-212. DOI:

Kamps, D., Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Wills, H., Longstaff, J., & Walton, C. (2007). Use of evidence-based, small-group reading instruction for English language learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 153˗168. DOI:

Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665-1692. DOI:

Lee, H., Jung, G., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Simple view of second language reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(6), 585-603. DOI:

LegiLexi (2023). LegiLexi God Läsförmåga LegiLexi Good reading ability.

Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(5), 612-620. DOI:

Lindamood, P., & Lindamood, P. (1998). The Lindamood phoneme sequencing program for reading, spelling, and speech. PRO-ED.

Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1873-1898. DOI:

Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Wolf, M., Steinbach, K. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889-914. DOI:

Löwenbrand-Jansson, G. (2018). FonoMix, Munmetoden - Fonologisk multisensorisk läsinlärningsmetod FonoMix - the Oral Method Phonological multisensory reading learning method. Gullow Förlag.

Ludwig, C., Guo, K., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Are reading interventions for English language learners effective?. A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), 220-231. DOI:

Melby‐Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross‐linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta‐analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114-135. DOI:

Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 217–225. DOI:

Nation, K. (2009). Reading comprehension and vocabulary. Beyond decoding. Guilford Press.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Natur & Kultur (2020). Läshoppet [Reading jump].

Nelson, J. R., Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of a tier 2 supplemental root word vocabulary and decoding intervention with kindergarten Spanish-speaking English learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 184-211. DOI:

Nilvius, C. (2022). Response to Intervention - en specialdidaktisk modell för att förebygga lässvårigheter: Från samlat forskningsläge till tillämpning i svensk skolkontext [Response to Intervention – a special didactic model preventing reading difficulities. From a research summary to Swedish school context] [PhD thesis]. Linnaeus University.

Nilvius, C., Fälth, L., Selenius, H. & Svensson, I. (2023). Examination of a multitiered RtI-model for identifying and supporting students at risk of reading difficulties in primary schools in Sweden [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Pedagogy and Learning, Linnaeus University.

O’Connor, R. E., Bocian, K. M., Beach, K., & Sanchez, T. (2014). Access to a responsiveness to intervention model: Does beginning intervention in kindergarten matter?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(4), 307–328. DOI:

Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge. DOI:

Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. DOI:

Peterson, E.R., Rubie-Davies, C., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. (2016). Teachers' explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap. Learning and Instruction, 42, 123-140. DOI:

Programme for International Student Assessment. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD.

Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD.

Programme for International Student Assessment.(2012). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD.

Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. (2011). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. IEA.

Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. (2016). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. IEA.

Riley, J. L. (1996). The ability to label the letters of the alphabet at school entry: A discussion on its value. Journal of Research in Reading, 19(2), 87-101. DOI:

Rivera, M. O., Moughamian, A. C., Lesaux, N. K., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Language and reading interventions for English language learners and English language learners with Disabilities. Center on Instruction.

Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25(2), 211-236. DOI:

Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174. DOI:

Sparks, R. L. (2019). Why reading is a challenge for U.S. L2 learners: The impact of cognitive, ecological, and psychological factors in L2 comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 727-743. DOI:

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 23-55. DOI:

Swedish Education Act (2010:800).

Swedish National Agency for Education (2022a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare (revised 2018).

Swedish National Agency for Education (2022b). Search statistics.

Swedish School Ordinance (2011:185).

Taube, K., Fredriksson, U., & Olofsson, Å. (2015). Kunskapsöversikt om läs- och skrivundervisning för yngre elever: Delrapport från SKOLFORSK-projektet Research Review of reading and writing education in early school years. Interim report from SKOLFORSK-project. Vetenskapsrådet [Swedish Research Council].

Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). Teaching for excellence in academically diverse classrooms. Society, 52, 203-209. DOI:

Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313-330. DOI:

Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25, 1805˗1818. DOI:

Wendick, G. (2018). IntensivLäsning - Upprepad läsning med strukturerade läslistor [Intensive Reading - Repeated reading with structured reading lists]. Wendick Utbildning.

Woore, R. (2010). Thinking aloud about L2 decoding: an exploration of the strategies used by beginner learners when pronouncing unfamiliar French words. Language Learning Journal, 38(1), 3-17. DOI:




How to Cite

Egerhag, H., Fälth, L., Nilvius, C., Selenius, H., & Svensson, I. (2023). Promoting decoding among young students with Swedish as a first and second language within a response to intervention model. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 4(2), 176–192.

Funding data