Parent perspectives on digital play-based early literacy-learning in marginalized communities

Lauri Pynnönen; Kristiina Kumpulainen; Lasse Lipponen

doi:10.37291/2717638X.202562679

Authors

Lauri Pynnönen University of Helsinki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-1754
Kristiina Kumpulainen University of British Columbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-0348
Lasse Lipponen University of Helsinki https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-0398

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202562679

Keywords:

Digital play, Literacy, Early childhood, Focus group discussions, South-Asia

Abstract

This study examined parent perspectives on digital play-based learning for early literacy development in non-formal educational settings in Pakistan and Bangladesh, where access to quality education remains limited for marginalized communities. Drawing on neo-ecological theory as a guiding framework, we conducted a qualitative focus group study in which we analysed discussions with 40 parents whose children participated in a three-month digital play-based literacy intervention implemented through community learning centres and refugee camps. The parents reported significant improvements in their children's English language capabilities and digital literacies, often describing instances that reversed traditional knowledge hierarchies within families, with children teaching their parents English pronunciation and digital navigation. However, the parents simultaneously expressed concerns about traditional writing skill development and future educational transitions. The intervention affected parent–child engagement in education, with many parents reporting increased school visits and children showing a newfound enthusiasm for attending classes. Notable variations emerged between communities with different levels of prior educational access, with refugee parents in Bangladesh showing greater enthusiasm for digital interventions than those with previous exposure to conventional education. The study demonstrated how parents in marginalized communities carefully evaluated digital play through contextual lenses, and challenged simplistic narratives about technology adoption in resource-constrained environments. The parents’ perspectives highlight both the transformative potential of digital play for early literacy and the importance of contextually responsive approaches to implementing interventions.

References

Ahmed, Q. W., Rönkä, A., & Perälä-Littunen, S. (2022). Rural children’s perceptions of parental involvement in their education in Pakistan. Education Sciences, 12(5), 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050323

Ahmed, Q. W., Rönkä, A., Perälä-Littunen, S., & Eerola, P. (2024). Parents’ involvement in their children’s education: Narratives from rural Pakistan. Educational Research, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2305821

Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.32.7.513

Canadian Paediatric Society. (2019). Digital media: Promoting healthy screen use in school-aged children and adolescents. Paediatrics & Child Health, 24(6), 402–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxz095

Chu, C., Paatsch, L., Kervin, L., & Edwards, S. (2024). Digital play in the early years: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 40, 100652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100652

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins, Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 416–437). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21

Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., Gemo, M., Di Gioia, R., & Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘Gatekeepers’ to ‘Scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(4), 414–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610616676024

Dresp-Langley, B. (2020). Children’s health in the digital age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093240

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Hilppö, J., Chimirri, N. A., & Rajala, A. (2019). Theorizing research ethics for the study of psychological phenomena from within relational everyday life. Human Arenas, 2(4), 405–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00073-x

Houghton, S., Hunter, S. C., Rosenberg, M., Wood, L., Zadow, C., Martin, K., & Shilton, T. (2015). Virtually impossible: Limiting Australian children and adolescents daily screen based media use. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-15-5

Ihmeideh, F., & Al-Maadadi, F. (2018). Towards improving kindergarten teachers’ practices regarding the integration of ICT into early years settings. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 65–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0366-x

Jamal, A. (2016). Why He Won’t Send His Daughter to School—Barriers to Girls’ Education in Northwest Pakistan: A Qualitative Delphi Study of Pashtun Men. Sage Open, 6(3), 2158244016663798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663798

Johnston, K. (2021). Engagement and immersion in digital play: Supporting young children’s digital wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910179

Kerai, S., Almas, A., Guhn, M., Forer, B., & Oberle, E. (2022). Screen time and developmental health: Results from an early childhood study in Canada. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12701-3

Lewis, K. L., Kervin, L. K., Verenikina, I., & Howard, S. J. (2024). Young children’s at-home digital experiences and interactions: An ethnographic study. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392379

Liu, S., Reynolds, B. L., Thomas, N., & Soyoof, A. (2024). The use of digital technologies to develop young children’s language and literacy skills: A systematic review. Sage Open, 14(1), 21582440241230850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241230850

Livingstone, S., Lemish, D., Lim, S. S., Bulger, M., Cabello, P., Claro, M., Cabello-Hutt, T., Khalil, J., Kumpulainen, K., Nayar, U. S., Nayar, P., Park, J., Tan, M. M., Prinsloo, J., & Wei, B. (2017). Global perspectives on children’s digital opportunities: An emerging research and policy agenda. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement_2), S137–S141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758S

Lowrie, T., & Larkin, K. (2020). Experience, represent, apply (ERA): A heuristic for digital engagement in the early years. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12789

Mączyńska, W., Dutkiewicz, J., Wijata, M., Wijata, A., Przybyłek-Stępień, Z., Bartosiński, R., Szustak, J., Kąpa, M., Szepietowski, B., Kaźmierczak, J., Rycerz, E., & Pasek, P. (2025). Impact of screen use on young children’s development: A review of research and recommendation. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 80, 59110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.80.59110

Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2023). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19338–19354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3

Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2018). GraphoLearn India: The effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention in supporting struggling readers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01045

Pekonidi, A. V. (2021). Digital addiction in children and adolescents. Modern diagnostics and treatment tactics. Russian Medical Inquiry, 5(5), 322–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-5-322-329

Pereira, Í. S. P., Parente, M. C. C., & Da Silva, M. C. V. (2023). Digital literacy in early childhood education: What can we learn from innovative practitioners? International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(1), 287–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1892598

Rosenthal, I., & Narciso, E. (2018). Clever Kids University [Computer software]. Footsteps2Brilliance. https://www.footsteps2brilliance.com/research/

Shah, D., Haider, G., & Taj, T. (2019). Causes of dropout rate at primary level in Pakistan. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 38–74.

Shohel, M. M. C. (2022). Education in emergencies: Challenges of providing education for Rohingya children living in refugee camps in Bangladesh. Education Inquiry, 13(1), 104–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1823121

Siskind, D., Conlin, D., Hestenes, L., Kim, S.-A., Barnes, A., & Yaya-Bryson, D. (2022). Balancing technology and outdoor learning: Implications for early childhood teacher educators. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 43(3), 389–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2020.1859024

Slutsky, R., & DeShetler, L. M. (2017). How technology is transforming the ways in which children play. Early Child Development and Care, 187(7), 1138–1146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1157790

Soyoof, A., Reynolds, B. L., Neumann, M., Scull, J., Tour, E., & McLay, K. (2024). The impact of parent mediation on young children’s home digital literacy practices and learning: A narrative review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 65–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12866

Straker, L., Zabatiero, J., Danby, S., Thorpe, K., & Edwards, S. (2018). Conflicting guidelines on young children’s screen time and use of digital technology create policy and practice dilemmas. The Journal of Pediatrics, 202, 300–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.019

Sulaymani, O., Fleer, M., & Chapman, D. (2018). Understanding children’s motives when using iPads in Saudi classrooms: Is it for play or for learning? International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(4), 340–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1454303

Von Gillern, S., Nash, B., Stufft, C., & Gould, H. (2022). Literacy educators’ attitudes on video games and learning. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Games Based Learning, 16(1), 793–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.16.1.860

Winther, D. K. (2017). How does the time children spend using digital technology impact their mental well-being, social relationships and physical activity? An evidence-focused literature review. Innocenti Discussion Paper 2017-02, UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti, Florence. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/8181/file/UNICEF-Innocenti-Time-Using-Digital-Tech-Impact-on-Wellbeing-2017.pdf

Wiseman, N., Harris, N., & Downes, M. (2019). Preschool children’s preferences for sedentary activity relates to parent’s restrictive rules around active outdoor play. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7235-x

Xie, J., Wang, M., & Hooshyar, D. (2021). Student, parent, and teacher perceptions towards digital educational games: How they differ and influence each other. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 142–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.008