Organizing digital competence development in preschools: Professionals’ insights from three Swedish municipalities


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202562555Keywords:
Continuing professional development, Digital competence, ICT educators, Preschool educators, Workplace learningAbstract
This article contributes to the understanding of how digital competence development (DCD) for preschool educators is organized across three Swedish municipalities, focusing on communal preschools and drawing on participants’ experiences. With a case study approach, the research addresses the growing need for DCD to integrate digital technology into pedagogy in preschool. Continuing professional development like this can be initiated and shaped through various methods, including formal education, courses, and programs. Another often more efficient approach is to support and enhance continuous, day-to-day learning in the workplace. However, in-depth research on such workplace learning and practice is lacking despite ongoing debates on digital tool use in early childhood education. Fifteen interviews with operational developers, development leaders, principals, and information and communication technology (ICT) educators serve as the basis for this study. Billet's theories on workplace learning frame the analysis, studying the organizing of DCD through the interdependence between possible learning opportunities (affordances) and the influences it has on individuals’ agency (engagement) within the cases. Findings highlight that ICT educators played a pivotal role in coaching and shaping professional development, suggesting that the learning opportunities available to staff were significantly influenced by the motivation and engagement of self-driven individuals, along with principal prioritization and municipal vision. This study also shows the availability of DCD through collegial cooperation, dedicated support groups and networks. The study underscores the importance of workplace learning for enhancing preschool educators' digital competence and proposes practical strategies to facilitate staff support.
References
Aspbury-Miyanishi, E. (2022). The affordances beyond what one does: Reconceptualizing teacher agency with Heidegger and Ecological Psychology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103662
Avby, G. (2016). Att genom reflektion organisera för en medveten och kunskapsrik praktik. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 21(3-4), 261–282.
Avidov-Ungar, O., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). ICT Coordinators’ TPACK-based leadership knowledge in their roles as agents of change. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 169–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3699
Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co–participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-2-00214
Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In A. Fuller, A. Munro & H. Rainbird (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp.109-125). Routledge.
Billett, S. (2010). The practices of learning through occupations. In S. Billett (Eds.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 59–81). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3939-2_4
Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O'Connor (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Workplace Learning (pp. 60–72). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200940.n5
Billett, S. (2023). The personal curriculum: Conceptions, intentions and enactments of learning across working life. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 42(5), 470–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2023.2245150
Billett, S., Barker, M., & Hernon-Tinning, B. (2004). Participatory practices at work. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(2), 233–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200198
Bittner, K., Hadley, F., & Waniganayake, M. (2020). Practitioner inquiry as a professional learning strategy to support technology integration in early learning centres: Building understanding through Rogoff’s planes of analysis. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 49–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1647871
Bittner, K., Highfield, K., & Hadley, F. (2018). Supporting young children as digital citizens: The importance of shared understandings of technology to support integration in play-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 896–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12664
Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators’ tablet computer use. Computers & Education, 98, 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.010
Chen, J.-Q., & Chang, C. (2006). Testing the “Whole Teacher” approach to professional development: A study of enhancing early childhood teachers’ technology proficiency. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 8(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1084920.pdf
Chen, J.-Q., & Price, V. (2006). Narrowing the digital divide: Head Start teachers develop proficiency in computer technology. Education and Urban Society, 38(4), 398–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124506287910
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Colmer, K. (2017). Collaborative professional learning: Contributing to the growth of leadership, professional identity and professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(3), 436–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2017.1308167
Cowan, K. (2019). Digital meaning making: Reggio Emilia-inspired practice in Swedish preschools. Media Education Research Journal, 8(2), 11–29.
Cramer, T., Canto Porto de Moraes, J., McKenna, A., Keays Hagerman, K., & Allen, L. (2022). Knowledge dissemination among early childhood staff members: A promising pathway for professional learning. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 43(4), 554–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.1954567
Dong, C. (2018). Preschool teachers’ perceptions and pedagogical practices: Young children’s use of ICT. Early Child Development and Care, 188(6), 635–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1226293
Douglass, A. L. (2019). The role of relationships: An exploratory study of early childhood educators earning a bachelor’s degree. Sage Open, 9(1),1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019837830
Dwyer, A., Jones, C., & Rosas, L. (2019). What digital technology do early childhood educators use and what digital resources do they seek? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1), 91–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119841459
Elek, C., & Page, J. (2019). Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: A review of empirical research literature. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 567–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781
El-Hamamsy, L., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Bruno, B., Roy, D., Cahlikova, T., Chevalier, M., Parriaux, G., Pellet, J.-P., Lanarès, J., Zufferey, J. D., & Mondada, F. (2021). A computer science and robotics integration model for primary school: Evaluation of a large-scale in-service K-4 teacher-training program. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2445–2475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10355-5
Forsling, K. (2023). Collegial learning and digital literacy education in a Swedish preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(1), 139–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01289-9
Fridberg, M., Redfors, A., Greca, I. M., & Terceño, E. M. G. (2023). Spanish and Swedish teachers’ perspective of teaching STEM and robotics in preschool – results from the botSTEM project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09717-y
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483–517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
Government Offices of Sweden. (2015). The Swedish model of government administration. Regeringskansliet. https://www.government.se/how-sweden-is-governed/the-swedish-model-of-government-administration/
Government Offices of Sweden. (2023a). Remiss av Statens skolverks förslag till nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet 2023–2027. Regeringskansliet. https://www.regeringen.se/remisser/2023/03/remiss-av-statens-skolverks-forslag-till-nationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-for-skolvasendet-20232027/
Government Offices of Sweden. (2023b). Pressträff med Johan Pehrson och Lotta Edholm om skärmtid i förskolan. Regeringskansliet. https://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2023/10/presstraff-med-johan-pehrson-och-lotta-edholm-om-skarmtid-i-forskolan/
Hager, P. (2011). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O'Connor (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Workplace Learning (pp. 17–31). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200940.n2
Hernwall, P. (2016). ‘We have to be professional’ – Swedish preschool teachers’ conceptualisation of digital media. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(1), 5–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-01-01
Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500077921
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Irons, J., & Hartnett, M. (2020). Computational thinking in junior classrooms in New Zealand. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 24(2), 28–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61468/jofdl.v24i2.425
Karolinska Institutet. (2023). Beslut om yttrande över förslag till nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet 2023–2027. (Dnr: 1-322/2023). https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/d818e658071b49cbb1a75a6b11fa725d/karolinskainstitutet.pdf
Kerckaert, S., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2015). The role of ICT in early childhood education: Scale development and research on ICT use and influencing factors. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(2), 183–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1016804
Landwehr Sydow, S., Åkerfeldt, A., & Falk, P. (2021). Becoming a Maker pedagogue: Exploring practices of making and developing a Maker mindset for preschools. FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021 - An International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education, June 2-3, Article 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3466725.3466756
Le, A. H., Billett, S., Choy, S., & Dymock, D. (2023). Supporting worklife learning at work to sustain employability. International Journal of Training and Development, 27(1), 135–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12288
Liu, X., Toki, E. I. & Pange, J. (2014). The use of ICT in preschool education in Greece and China: A comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1167–1176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1281
Magnusson, L. O. (2023). Digital technology and the subjects of literacy and mathematics in the preschool atelier. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 24(3), 333-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120983485
Marklund, L. (2015). Preschool teachers’ informal online professional development in relation to educational use of tablets in Swedish preschools. Professional Development in Education, 41(2), 236–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.999380
Marklund, L. (2022). Swedish preschool teachers’ perceptions about digital play in a workplace-learning context. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 42(2), 167–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2019.1658065
Masoumi, D. (2015). Preschool teachers’ use of ICTs: Towards a typology of practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(1), 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949114566753
Masoumi, D. (2021). Situating ICT in early Childhood teacher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3009–3026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10399-7
Ministry of Education and Research. (2017). Nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet (2017-2022). https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/72ff9b9845854d6c8689017999228e53/nationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-for-skolvasendet.pdf
Nehez, J., Blossing, U., Gyllander Torkildsen, L., Lander, R., & Olin, A. (2022). Middle leaders translating knowledge about improvement: Making change in the school and preschool organisation. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 315–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09418-2
Ng, W. (2015). Adopting new digital technologies in education: Professional learning. In W. Ng (Eds.), New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators (pp. 25–48). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05822-1_2
Otterborn, A., Schönborn, K., & Hultén, M. (2019). Surveying preschool teachers’ use of digital tablets: General and technology education related findings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 717–737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9469-9
Pettersson, F. (2018). Digitally competent school organizations: Developing supportive organizational infrastructures. Seminar.net: Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 132–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2976
Plowman, L., & McPake, J. (2013). Seven myths about young children and technology. Childhood Education, 89(1), 27–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2013.757490
Rönnerman, K., Grootenboer, P., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2017). The practice architectures of middle leading in early childhood education. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 11(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-017-0032-z
SALAR. (2013). Frågor och svar om lärares arbetstid. https://skr.se/skr/tjanster/cirkular/cirkular/2013/fragorochsvaromlararesarbetstid.23892.html
SALAR. (2018). Örat mot rälsen – Hur är digitaliseringsläget på landets skolor och förskolor? https://skr.se/download/18.42336a32177c8ab158d4e747/1615562056739/Presentation%20av%20data%20LIKA%203.0%20it-tempen%20f%C3%B6r%20skola%20och%20f%C3%B6rskola%20nov%202018.pdf
SALAR. (2019). #skolDigiplan. Nationell handlingsplan för digitalisering av skolväsendet. https://skr.se/skr/tjanster/rapporterochskrifter/publikationer/nationellhandlingsplanfordigitaliseringavskolvasendet.65276.html
SALAR. (2023a). Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. https://skr.se/skr/englishpages.411.html
SALAR. (2023b). Nationell strategi och handlingsplan – skolans digitalisering 2017–2022. https://skr.se/skr/skolakulturfritid/forskolagrundochgymnasieskolakomvux/digitaliseringskola/nationellstrategiochhandlingsplan.30970.html
Samuelsson, R., Price, S., & Jewitt, C. (2022). How pedagogical relations in early years settings are reconfigured by interactive touchscreens. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 58–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13152
Schachter, R. E. (2015). An analytic study of the professional development research in early childhood education. Early Education and Development, 26(8), 1057–1085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1009335
Schachter, R. E., Hatton-Bowers, H., Jackson, H., & Knoche, L. L. (2024). An exploratory study of early childhood coaches’ practices and professional learning needs. Early Years, 44(1), 173–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2022.2108378
Schei, V., & Nerbø, I. (2015). The invisible learning ceiling: Informal learning among preschool teachers and assistants in a Norwegian kindergarten. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(3), 299–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21213
SFS 2010:800. (2023). Skollag. [The Education Act]. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800/#K8
Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A., & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 377–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802582795
SNAE. (2018). Läroplan för förskolan, Lpfö 18. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/styrdokument/2018/laroplan-for-forskolan-lpfo-18
SNAE. (2022a). Förslag på en nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet 2023−2027. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/regeringsuppdrag/2022/forslag-pa-en-nationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-for-skolvasendet-2023-2027
SNAE. (2022b). Skolverkets uppföljning av digitaliseringsstrategin 2021. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/rapporter/2022/skolverkets-uppfoljning-av-digitaliseringsstrategin-2021
SNAE. (2023a). Barn och personal i förskola – Hösten 2022. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/beskrivande-statistik/2023/barn-och-personal-i-forskola---hosten-2022
SNAE. (2023b). Sök statistik om förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning. https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/sok-statistik-om-forskola-skola-och-vuxenutbildning
SNAE. (2024). Översyn av området digitalisering i förskolans läroplan. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/regeringsuppdrag/2024/oversyn-av-omradet-digitalisering-i-forskolans-laroplan
SNAE. (2025). Nationellt professionsprogram för rektorer, lärare och förskollärare. https://www.skolverket.se/omoss/varverksamhet/skolverketsprioriteradeomraden/lararforsorjningen/nationelltprofessionsprogram.4.1cf74b4f183ff5ed37549a0.html
Stockholm University. (2023). Yttrande: Statens skolverks förslag till nationell digitaliseringsstrategi - Stockholms universitet. https://www.su.se/om-universitetet/samarbeten-och-samh%C3%A4llsutveckling/remisser-och-utredningar-vid-stockholms-universitet/yttrande-statens-skolverks-f%C3%B6rslag-till-nationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-1.661792
Thorpe, K., Hansen, J., Danby, S., Zaki, F. M., Grant, S., Houen, S., Davidson, C., & Given, L. M. (2015). Digital access to knowledge in the preschool classroom: Reports from Australia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 174–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.04.001
UNCRC. (2021). General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment (CRC/C/GC/25). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2021-childrens-rights-relation
Undheim, M. (2022). Children and teachers engaging together with digital technology in early childhood education and care institutions: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(3), 472–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1971730
UNESCO. (2022). Building and strengthening the legal framework on ECCE rights: Achievements, challenges and actions for change. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383594
University of Gothenburg. (2023). Statens skolverks förslag till nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet 2023-2027 (Dnr: GU 2023/700, U2022/03951). https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/d818e658071b49cbb1a75a6b11fa725d/goteborgs-universitet.pdf
Wadel, C. C., & Knaben, Å. D. (2022). Untapped potential for professional learning and development: Kindergarten as a learning organization. International Journal of Early Childhood, 54(2), 261–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-021-00303-w
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Journal of Childhood, Education & Society retains the commercial rights of this article.