Developing child-friendly cities: Young children’s participation in urban planning
Abstract views: 358 / PDF downloads: 185
Keywords:City planning, Child-friendly infrastructure, Nature, Play, Young children
This article is based on a collaborative project between a municipality and a research team, aiming to investigate participatory methods that promote young children’s interest and participation in, and access to express their views in connection with, urban planning processes. The research question was: What characterizes a child-friendly city for young children and their families? The article is framed within the perspective of children’s rights, affordance and child-friendly outdoor environments. The project has employed multiple research methods. The participants were children (aged 3-6) and parents from three early childhood education and care institutions. The children (n=16) participated in guided tours, field conversations, drawing and constructive play using Lego. The parents (n=14) participated by identifying the locations that they preferred to frequent with their children, and a structured survey was used to identify what the parents liked and disliked about the places they identified. Our findings indicate that there are four important features that characterise a child-friendly city: 1) The availability of ‘green lungs’, 2) Creative and challenging play opportunities, 3) Places for the whole family, and 4) Safe playgrounds and walking routes. We discuss how better knowledge of what characterizes a child-friendly city can contribute to planning processes.
Agarwal, M. K., Sehgal, V., & Ogra, A. (2021). Creating a child-friendly environment: An interpretation of children’s drawings from planned neighborhood parks of lucknow city. Societies, 11(3), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030080
Arup. (2017). Cities alive: Designing for urban childhoods. Arup. https://www.arup.com//media/arup/files/publications/u/cities_alivedesigning_for_urban_childhoods.pdf
Ataol, Ö., Krishnamurthy, S., & Van Wesemael, P. (2019). Children's participation in urban planning and design: A systematic review. Children, Youth and Environments, 29(2), 27-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.29.2.0027
Ataol, Ö., Krishnamurthy, S., Druta, O., & van Wesemael, P. (2022). Towards inclusive urban environments for infants and toddlers: Assessing four urban neighborhoods in Istanbul with mothers. Children & Society, 36(6), 1177-1193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12566
Barker, J. (2003). Passengers or political actors? Children's participation in transport policy and the micro political geographies of the family. Space and Polity, 7(2), 135-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1356257032000133900
Bosco, F. J. & Joassart-Marcelli, P. (2015). Participatory planning and children’s emotional labor in the production of urban nature. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2015.07.003
Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Fagerholm, N. (2013). Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 110-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.001
Broch, T. B., Gundersen, V., Vistad, O. I., Selvaag, S. K., & Wold, L. C. (2022). Barn og natur–organiserte møteplasser for samvær og naturglede. NINA Temahefte 87, 5-31.
Brown, F. C. (2011). Playwork: A Profession challenging societal factors devaluing childrens play. Journal of Student Wellbeing. 5(1), 58-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21913/JSW.v5i1.732
Carroll, P., Witten, K., Asiasiga, L., & Lin, E. Y. (2019). Children's engagement as urban researchers and consultants in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Can it increase children's effective participation in urban planning?. Children & Society, 33(5), 414-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12315
Cele, S. & van Der Burgt, D. (2015). Participation, consultation, confusion: professionals' understandings of children's participation in physical planning. Children's Geographies, 13(1), 14-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.827873
Cele, S. (2006). Communicating place: methods for understanding children's experience of place [Unpublished Doctorate thesis], Stockholm University
Christian, H., Zubrick, S. R., Foster, S., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Wood, L., Knuiman, M., Brinkman, S., Houghton, S., & Boruff, B. (2015). The influence of the neighborhood physical environment on early child health and development: A review and call for research. Health & Place, 33, 25-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.005
Clark, A. (2017). Listening to young children, expanded third edition: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach (3rd. ed.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Clement, S. & Waitt, G. (2018). Pram mobilities: affordances and atmospheres that assemble childhood and motherhood on-the-move. Children's Geographies, 16(3), 252-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1432849
Cutts, B. B., Darby, K. J., Boone, C. G., & Brewis, A. (2009). City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Social science & medicine, 69(9), 1314-1322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.020
Derr, V. & Kovács, I. G. (2015). How participatory processes impact children and contribute to planning: A case study of neighborhood design from Boulder, Colorado, USA. Journal of Urbanism, 10(1), 29–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2015.1111925
Drammen Municipality. (2023). Co-creation/Participation. Retrieved from: https://www.drammen.kommune.no/politikk-samfunn/planer/omradeutviklingsstrategi-for-stromso/omradeutviklingsstrategi-for-stromso/samskaping/
Ergler, C. R., Freeman, C., & Guiney, T. (2021). Walking with preschool‐aged children to explore their local wellbeing affordances. Geographical Research, 59(1), 118-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12402
Ergler, C. R., Freeman, C., & Guiney, T. (2022). Pre‐schoolers’ vision for liveable cities: Creating ‘care‐full’urban environments. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 113(2), 131-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12461
Ergler, C. R., Kearns, R., & Witten, K. (2016). Exploring children’s seasonal play to promote active lifestyles in Auckland, New Zealand. Health & Place, 41, 67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.07.001
Ergler, C., Smith, K., Kotsanas, C., & Hutchinson, C. (2015). What makes a good city in pre-schoolers' eyes? Findings from participatory planning projects in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Urban Design, 20(4), 461-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1045842
Freeman, C., Ergler, C., & Guiney, T. (2017). Planning with preschoolers: City mapping as a planning tool. Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), 297-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1374790
Gauvin, L., Tizzoni, M., Piaggesi, S., Young, A., Adler, N., Verhulst, S., Ferres, L., & Cattuto, C. (2020). Gender gaps in urban mobility. Humanit & Social Sciences Communications, 7(11), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0500-x
Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin
Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children's engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children Youth and Environments, 24(2), 10-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2014.0024
Gill, T. (2021). Urban playground: How child-friendly planning and design can save cities. Riba Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003108658
Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
Hagen, A. L. & Andersen, B. (2021). Introduksjon til ung medvirkning, kreativitet og konflikt i planlegging. I A.L. Hagen & B. Andersen (Red.), Ung medvirkning: Kreativitet og konflikt i planlegging (Chapter 1, p. 11–41). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.150.ch1
Haikkola, L., Pacilli, M. G., Horelli, L., & Prezza, M. (2007). Interpretations of urban child-friendliness: A comparative study of two neighborhoods in Helsinki and Rome. Children Youth and Environments, 17(4), 319-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2007.0025
Jørgensen, K. A. (2017). Storied landscapes: Children’s experiences and sense of place. In T.I.M. Waller, E. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E.B.H. Sandseter, L. Lee-Hammond, K.S. Lekies & S. Wyver (Eds.). The sage handbook of outdoor play and learning. SAGE Publications, Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402028.n39
Kallio, K. P., Wood, B. E., & Häkli, J. (2020). Lived citizenship: Conceptualising an emerging field. Citizenship Studies, 24(6), 713-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1739227
Källsmyr, K., Nergård, I., & Bratvold, B. (2013). Det er her jeg bor! Barn og unges medvirkning i kommunalplanlegging. https://vfb.no/app/uploads/2019/03/WEB_KommunalHNDBOK_sept 13.pdf
Kamruzzaman, S. S. (2017). Association between the built environment and children’s independent mobility: A meta-Analytic review. Journal of Transport Geography, 61, 104-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.004
Kleine, D., Pearson, G., & Poveda, S. (2016). Participatory methods: Engaging children’s voices and experiences in research. Global Kids Online. www.globalkidsonline.net/participatoryresearch
Krishnamurthy, S. (2019). Reclaiming spaces: child inclusive urban design. Cities & Health, 3(1-2), 86-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1586327
Kruger, J. S., & Chawla, L. (2002). “We know something someone doesn’t know”: children speak out on local conditions in Johannesburg. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 85-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400207
Kyttä, M. (2003). Children in outdoor contexts: affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness. [Doctoral dissertation] Helsinki University of Technology.
Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00073-2
Lange, A. (2018). The Design of Childhood: How the Material World Shapes Independent Kids. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Little, H. (2015). Mothers’ beliefs about risk and risk-taking in children’s outdoor play. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(1), 24-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2013.842178
Mansfield, R. G., Batagol, B., & Raven, R. (2021). “Critical agents of change?”: Opportunities and limits to children’s participation in urban planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(2), 170-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220988645
Mensah, C. A., Andres, L., Perera, U., & Roji, A. (2016). Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: A systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 142-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i1.445
Merewether, J. (2018). Listening to young children outdoors with pedagogical documentation. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(3), 259-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1421525
Nordbakke, S. (2019). Children's out-of-home leisure activities: Changes during the last decade in Norway. Children's Geographies, 17(3), 347-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1510114
Nordbø, E. C. A., Nordh, H., Raanaas, R. K., & Aamodt, G. (2020). Promoting activity participation and well-being among children and adolescents: a systematic review of neighborhood built-environment determinants. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(3), 370-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00051
Raymond, C. M., Kyttä, M., & Stedman, R. (2017). Sense of place, fast and slow: The potential contributions of affordance theory to sense of place. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01674
Ruud, M. E., Eika, A., Gohari, S., & Tønnesen, M. (2022). Sosiokulturell stedsanalyse for Strømsø [Sociocultural site analysis for Strømsø]. NIBR-Report 2022:6. Oslo Metropolitan University
Sinclair, R. & Franklin, A. (2000). A Quality Protects Research Briefing: Young People’s Participation. Department of Health, Research in Practice and Making Research Count: London.
Skar, M., Wold, L. C., Gundersen, V., & O’Brien, L. (2016). Why do children not play in nearby nature? Results from a Norwegian survey. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(3), 239-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1140587
Smith, K., & Kotsanas, C. (2014). Honouring young children’s voices to enhance inclusive communities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(2), 187-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2013.820211
Thorén, A. K. H. & Nordbø, E. C. A. (2020). Er det plass til dem? Barn i by og tettsted. Plan, 52(2), 22-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3045-2020-02-05
UNCRC. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html
UNCRC. (2013). General comment No. 17 on the right of the child to rest, leisure, play, recreational activities, cultural life and the arts (art. 31). United Nation. https://www.refworld.org/docid/51ef9bcc4.html
UNICEF (2012). The state of the world’s children 2012: children in an urban world. UNICEF.
UNICEF (2018) Child Friendly Cities and Communities Handbook. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CFCI-handbook-NewDigital-May-2018.pdf
Wilks, J. & Rudner, J. (2013). A voice for children and young people in the city. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2013.12
Yao, S. & Xiaoyan, L. (2017). Exploration on ways of research and construction of Chinese child-friendly city: A case study of Changsha. Procedia Engineering, 198, 699–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.121
Zhang, C., Dai, S., & Xia, H. (2020). Reuse of abandoned railways leads to urban regeneration: A tale from a rust track to a Green Corridor in Zhangjiakou. Urban Rail Transit, 6, 104-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-020-00127-2
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Childhood, Education & Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Author(s) must confirm that the Journal of Childhood, Education & Society retains all the copyrights unconditionally and indefinitely to publish articles.