Exploring child protection professional's perspectives on ethnic inequalities in the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37291/jces.839Keywords:
Ethnic inequalities, Children’s social care, Survey, Quantitative research, Professionals perspectivesAbstract
Ethnic inequalities within the children's social care system remain a concern in the United Kingdom, with evidence that children from certain “minority'’ ethnic groups enter care at rates higher than their proportion in the general child population. While some ethnicities, including Black and Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities, face heightened intervention, others such as children from Asian communities, are underrepresented. Children’s social care in the United Kingdom refers to the statutory services provided by local authorities to safeguard and promote the welfare of children who are at risk of harm. This research reports the quantitative findings from Phase 1 of a larger sequential mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase consisted of an online survey of 244 professionals across children’s social care. The survey explored patterns in the professional perspectives, training experiences, and knowledge, providing an empirical foundation for later qualitative phases. This study responds to limitations in the evidence base, including inconsistencies in how ethnicity is recorded and interpreted in children’s social care, by examining patterns of ethnic inequalities where certain groups experience disproportionate intervention, unequal outcomes across referrals, assessments and longer-term care experiences. Descriptive and inferential analyse revealed that 39.8% of participants had witnessed ethnic inequalities and 53.3% reported racial prejudice within the system. Cultural misunderstandings, poverty and inadequate training were identified as key influences. Professionals from marginalised ethnic backgrounds were more likely to recognise inequalities. Findings highlight gaps in cultural competence and workforce training, indicating the need for stronger professional development and culturally informed policy.
References
Allen, D., & Hamnett, V. (2022). Gypsy, Roma and Traveller children in child welfare services in England. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(7), 3904–3922. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab265
Allen, D., & Riding, S. (2018). The fragility of professional competence: A preliminary account of child protection practice with Romani and Traveller children in England (European Roma Rights Centre). https://www.errc.org/uploads/upload_en/file/the-fragility-of-professional-competence-january-2018.pdf
Alvarez, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2025). Ethnic biases and risk for discrimination in child welfare assessments. Child Welfare, 104(2), 123–142.
Banaji, M., et al. (2021). The causes and effects of racial inequality: Understanding systemic racism and its impact on opportunities and treatment. Journal of Social Psychology and Inequality, 58(2), 130–145.
Bernard, C. A. (2001). Constructing lived experiences: Representations of Black mothers in child sexual abuse discourses. Ashgate.
British Association of Social Workers. (2021). BASW England policy statement on the independent review of children’s social care. https://basw.co.uk/articles/basw-england-policy-statement-independent-review-childrens-social-care
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bywaters, P., & Child Welfare Inequalities Project Team. (2020). The Child Welfare Inequalities Project: Final report. University of Huddersfield. https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/files/21398145/CWIP_Final_Report.pdf
Bywaters, P., Kwhali, J., Brady, G., Sparks, T., & Bos, E. (2017). Out of sight, out of mind: Ethnic inequalities in child protection and out-of-home care intervention rates. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 1884–1902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw165
Bywaters, P., Scourfield, J., Webb, C., Morris, K., Featherstone, B., Brady, G., Jones, C., & Sparks, T. (2019). Paradoxical evidence on ethnic inequities in child welfare: Towards a research agenda. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.042
Cullen, F., McPherson, T., & Skelton, C. (2023). Connecting worlds: Social work educators’ perceptions on the role of lived experience in pedagogic practice. Social Work Education, 43(3), 734-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2142548
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press.
Department for Education. (2024). Children looked after in England including adoptions. GOV.UK.
Dettlaff, A. J., & Rycraft, J. R. (2009). Cultural competence in child welfare: A review of the literature. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 53–75.
Dominelli, L. (2018). Anti-racist social work (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53420-0
Fanon, F. (1952). Black skin, white masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). Grove Press.
Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & White, S. (2018). Protecting children: A social model. Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447332732.001.0001
Feely, M. (2021). Racial biases in child welfare systems: An examination of disproportionality and decision-making. Journal of Social Policy and Practice, 35(3), 245–260.
Ferguson, H. (2017). How children become invisible in child protection work: Findings from research into day-to-day social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1007–1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw065
Gilligan, P. (2006). Cultural barriers to the disclosure of child sexual abuse in Asian communities: Listening to what women say. British Journal of Social Work, 36(8), 1361–1377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch309
Gorski, P. C. (2019). Avoiding racial equity detours. Educational Leadership, 76(7), 56–61.
Jahoda, G. (2012). Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture.” Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 289–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446229
Javed, A., Smith, L., & Brown, K. (2025). Ethnic representation and inequalities among children and young people in UK care: A systematic review. Child Welfare Review, 42(1), 15–38.
Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., & Park, G. (2021). When is a Likert scale interval? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(9), 822–823.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kim, H.-Y. (2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 42(2), 152–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. (2025). Ethnic inequalities in the children’s care system in the UK: Challenges and recommendations. https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/research-resources/2025/summary-child-safeguarding-practice-review-panel-briefing-race-racism?
Pandis, N. (2016). The chi-square test. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 150(5), 898–899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.009
Paric, M., Rodriguez-Feria, P., Calle, M. C., Lagos, G., Commers, M., & Czabanowska, K. (2025). Cultural competence: An integrated set of knowledge, skills, behaviours, attitudes, and practices for effective cross-cultural engagement. Healthcare, 12(10), 1040.
Pollock, L., Ahmed, R., Williams, S., & Patel, N. (2024). Race and ethnicity in child and family social work: A five-year longitudinal mixed-methods study. Department for Education.
Rana, R., & Singhal, R. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 1(1), 69–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-5414.157577
Rashmi, P. (2020). Surveillance and intervention: The impact of societal prejudices on ethnic minority families. Journal of Social Justice Studies, 15(3), 210–225.
Robinson, L., & Scott, D. (2016). Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare: Causes and consequences. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(2), 147–162.
Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (2016). Handbook of the psychology of aging (8th ed.). Elsevier.
Shah, A. (2023). Conscious and unconscious bias in social services: Impacts on ethnic minority families. Social Work Review, 28(1), 34–48.
Shea, L., Pesa, J., Geonnotti, G., Powell, V., Kahn, C., & Peters, W. (2022). Improving diversity in study participation: Patient perspectives on barriers, racial differences and the role of communities. Health Expectations, 25(4), 1979–1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13554
UK Parliament. (2024). Looked-after children: Trends and statistics in England (Written evidence submitted to the Education Committee).
UK Parliament. (2025). Written questions, answers and statements: Number of social care staff by gender in each region and nation.
Webb, C., Bywaters, P., Scourfield, J., Davidson, G., & Bunting, L. (2020). Cuts both ways: Ethnicity, poverty and the social gradient in child welfare interventions. Children and Youth Services Review, 117, 105299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105299
White, J. (2017). Structural inequalities and their impact on ethnic minority families. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 251–268.
Yeo, J., & Jeon, S. H. (2023). Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in recent public administration research: A systematic review of the literature since George Floyd. Journal of Policy Studies, 38(2), 33–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52372/jps38204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Journal of Childhood, Education & Society retains the commercial rights of this article.




