Preschool teachers’ views of democratic learning processes in Sweden: Intergenerational perspective in interaction with children

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37291/jces.697

Keywords:

Situated democracy, Lifelong learning, Subjectification, Children’s agency, Reflexive processes

Abstract

Democracy based education has been a central part of policy documents in preschool in Sweden. Research in early childhood education have focussed on practicing democracy and on childrens’ influence, though with a lack of intergenerational perspective, which this article will discuss. The aim of this study is to explore everyday democratic learning processes framed by an intergenerational perspective, to understand democracy in a preschool context by the research question: How do preschool teachers describe the situated democratic learning processes? The article explores preschool teachers’ reflections on how their own adult-centric agenda limited or enhanced democratic learning processes in their daily practices, during meal-time situations, circle time situations and child initiated play. The theoretical approach is an intergenerational learning perspective problematized in the view of lifelong learning in terms of learning to know, learning to do, learning to be, and learning to live together. Central concepts are relational agency and democratic subjectification. Findings will be presented under categories of: A) Features of lived democracy that became visible in the critical incidents. B) The obstacles to children’s democratic participation. C) Teachers facilitate a lived democracy. Two conclusions are drawn; 1) situated democracy as parallel learning processes between teachers and children, 2) democracy is constructed in children-teacher-agency in situated practice and children’s impact has to be considered.

👁 Abstract Views: 190📥 PDF Downloads: 40

References

Alnervik, K. (2018). Systematic documentation: Structures and tools in a practice of communicative documentation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(1), 72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118762147

Banks, J. A., Frydenberg, E., & Liang, R. (2023). Promoting social and emotional learning in early childhood through intergenerational programming: A systematic review. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 41(1), 12–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2023.2289626

Bath, C., & Karlsson, R. (2016). The ignored citizen: Young children’s subjectivities in Swedish and English early childhood education settings. Childhood, 23(4), 554-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216631025

Biesta, G. (2020), Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2019). Talking about education: Exploring the significance of teachers' talk for teacher agency. In N. Wahlström, D. Alvunger & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Teachers matter–but how? (pp. 38-54). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351008808-4

Biesta, G.J.J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Sense Publishers.

Boström, A-K., & Schmidt-Hertha, B. (2017). Intergenerational relationships and lifelong learning. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(1), 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2017.1260408

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. (2ed). Oxford University Press.

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford University Press.

Hedges, H. (2021). Contemporary principles to lead understandings of children’s learning: Synthesizing Vygotsky, Rogoff, Wells and Lindfors. Early Child Development and Care, 191(7–8), 1056–1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1849169

Jackson, N. J. (2023). Steps to an ecology of lifelong-lifewide learning for sustainable, regenerative futures. In K. Evans, W.O. Lee, J. Markowitsch & M. Zukas (Eds.), Third international handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 283-306). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19592-1_15

Johansson, E. & Emilson, A. (2016). Conflicts and resistance: Potentials for democracy learning in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(1), 19–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2015.1133073

Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023

Lenz Taguchi, H. (2000). Emancipation och motstånd. Dokumentation och kooperativa läroprocesser i förskolan [Published doctoral thesis]. Stockholm University.

Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why ‘listening to children’ and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458970

Martins, T., Midão, L., Martínez Veiga, S., Dequech, L., Busse, G., Bertram, M., McDonald, A., Gilliland, G., Orte, C., Vives, M., & Costa, E. (2019). Intergenerational programs review: Study design and characteristics of intervention, outcomes, and effectiveness. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17(1), 93-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1500333

Moon, J.A. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: theory and practice. Kogan Page.

Pechtelidis, Y., & Kioupkiolis, A. (2020). Education as commons, children as commoners: The case study of the little tree community. Democracy and Education, 28 (1), Article 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65214/2164-7992.1459

Ribaeus, K., Skånfors, L. (2019). Preschool children as democratic subjects: Agents of democracy. In V. Margrain & A Löfdahl Hultman, (Eds), Challenging democracy in early childhood education. International perspectives on early childhood education and development (Vol 28, pp. 233-245). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7771-6_16

Schmidt-Hertha, B. (2014). Different concepts of generation and their impact on intergenerational learning. In B. Schmidt-Hertha, S. Jelenc Krasovec & M. Formosa (Eds.), Learning across generations in Europe (pp. 145–153). Sense Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-902-9_12

Shih, Y.-H., Wu, C.-C., & Chung, C.-F. (2022). Implementing intergenerational learning in a preschool: A case study from Taiwan. Educational Gerontology, 48(12), 565–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2053035

Sousa, D., & Moss, P. (2023). Rumo a uma cultura democrática e prática política na Educação de Infância: O caso para uma mudança transformadora num momento de crise convergente. ETD-Educação Temática Digital, 25(00), e023067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/etd.v25i00.8672067

Swedish National Agency for Education. (2018). Curriculum for the preschool Lpfö 18. https://www.skolverket.se/andra-sprak-other-languages/english-engelska

Swedish Research Council. (2017). God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådet. https://www.vr.se/analys/rapporter/vara-rapporter/2017-08-29-god-forskningssed.html

United Nations Children's Fund [UNICEF]. (2020). Convention on the rights of the child. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention

Wyness, M. (2013). Children’s participation and intergenerational dialogue: Bringing adults back into the analysis. Childhood, 20(4), 429–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212459775

Wyness, M. (2023). The uneven distribution of children’s rights: Schooling, caring and “living” rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 31(1), 89–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30040009

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

Karlsson, R. (2026). Preschool teachers’ views of democratic learning processes in Sweden: Intergenerational perspective in interaction with children. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 7(2), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.37291/jces.697